Jon-
Oh, I didn’t know your mom was a doctor! How cool.

Natalie-
Haha, “ninja” as a verb FTW!

Sonja-
1. LOVED that line too! Her grandmother anecdotes were fabulous.
2. {nods} Another gem.
3. More below…
4. HEE.

Jon, Sonja, and Natalie-
I think there should be a balance. I absolutely believe we all have the right to write about whatever we want. I can write about a slave, or an undiscovered planet, or love. The question is, can I write about those things in a compelling and believable way? And please note that I think “believable” is very different from accurate.

This may be an unpopular opinion, but I think it’s okay to take artistic license sometimes. Yes, you risk losing some readers’ trust. But you know what, not everyone was going to like you anyway. So it’s more important, IMO, to do what works best for the story and the characters. If you need to fudge things a little bit to accomplish that, then so be it.

Example: There are TONS of doctors who can’t stand to watch Grey’s Anatomy or ER or any of those shows. Why? Because they do so many things that real doctors would never do in a million years. Sex in the on-call room. Cutting someone’s LVAD wire. Etc. etc. But guess what? There are MILLIONS of viewers (including me, hahaha) who eat those shows up. Who are willing to overlook a few “unlikely” actions in order to follow the story, the character arcs, the drama. Now, if Grey’s took TOO much liberty, and didn’t show the doctors scrubbing in/sterilizing before surgery, or they had the hospital decorated as if it were a living room from the 70s, or whatever — then that’s not just fudging anymore; that’s plain old f-cking up.

So the Grey’s writers have to find the balance between the story and reality. And I think that’s fine.

Of course, not everyone will agree with my philosophy, and they will write different kinds of books. Books that stick 100% to the way things are done in reality. And that’s fine too. They will lose readers for other reasons, I’m sure. Because you can’t please everyone, and there is no *right* way to write a book.

Like, just because I’m a white, 26-year-old woman, does that mean the only stories I’m allowed to write should be about what it is to be me? I don’t think so. I think I have a right to explore all sorts of lives and stories—male and female, outside my race or even species, maybe even in fully made up worlds.

Fiction is for exploring—for reaching outside yourself and seeing what it might be like to live in another life. Good research should come with that, but the point is to not fear what’s outside our circle. To learn. Study. Grow.

What Sonja says in her third point goes for me too. If you aren’t writing what you know, you better have all of the background information straight. Writing is pretty permanent, so do a fact check!

1. It has nothing to do with storytelling, but I loved when she said (more or less), “My grandmother started praying that I would get married, and because God loves her, I did.” Great line!

2. This quote is something I will spend some time thinking about: “Knowledge that takes us not beyond ourselves is far worse than ignorance.”

3. And I’m not sure what to make of one of her last points, which is *not* to write what you know. I’ve had several experiences of reading a novel and coming up against facts that are just wrong – clearly the author didn’t “know” that subject matter – and it greatly compromised my ability to enjoy and succumb to the story, even the parts that were “right.” I think it is entirely possible to write about something that you haven’t experienced (I do that all the time) but I try to research the “unexperienced” and “know” it as much as I possibly can, and I also try to be very careful not to step outside of my acquired knowledge of the unfamiliar subject I am writing about. I get what she’s saying as a larger concept, but I’m afraid that the “truth” of the story can be lost if this concept is taken too far. In a lot of ways, writing fiction is like building a house of cards, and if your reader suddenly realizes that one of the cards isn’t there after all, the whole thing can fall down around him/her.

4. But! Sexy woman with sexy accent talks for 20 minutes? Mmm, mmm, good. :)

(I might have to ninja this—I will credit you for the find though.)